The MVP Advantage: Launching Your Product with Confidence
Launching a successful product is challenging, but it doesn't have to be a gamble. There is a way to test the waters, validate your idea, and gather...
11 min read
Written by Keith Shields, Nov 22, 2024
Launching a minimum viable product (MVP) allows businesses to test the market for their app or software product before investing in a fully-fledged version. Positioned after a proof-of-concept (POC) and prototype but before refining the final product, an MVP offers a lean, iterative approach to product development.
Despite being a relatively conservative step, an MVP still requires funding. Considering about one-third of startups fail because they run out of cash, businesses must budget accurately for MVP development.
Estimating costs before an MVP build helps founders avoid hidden expenses and plan for a lean launch. In this article, we’ll break down the costs of building an MVP, identify key cost drivers, and offer tips for managing expenses effectively.
The cost of building an MVP varies widely, ranging anywhere from $10,000 on the low end to $400,000 or more on the high end. The true answer to, “How much does it cost to build an MVP?” is, “It depends.” Here’s a quick breakdown:
To find out where your project lands on this broad spectrum of development cost, you must understand which app elements act as price levers, pushing costs up or down. In the following sections, we’ll explore these key factors and offer clear examples to help you zero in on a precise budget.
Generally speaking, the cost of MVP development increases with complexity. That means a high-complexity app with lots of features will be more expensive than a simpler one. For example, an MVP for an employee resource planning (ERP) app that requires integration with other systems will almost certainly cost more than a basic fitness tracker app with limited functionality.
To assess how simple or complicated your MVP is, think of complexity in three buckets: basic, moderate, and high.
Remember, by definition, an MVP should include only essential features. Future iterations may add complexity with new features; however, unnecessary functionality at this stage can waste valuable resources and slow the development process.
Learn More: MVP Development: Formula to Learn What Features to Build into Your MVP
Intuitively, it makes sense that higher MVP complexity leads to higher development costs. Including complex features, like proprietary technology and database integration, requires more developer time. These additional hours increase labor costs. Likewise, some complex features might necessitate the help of a specialized expert, which also adds to the price of labor.
An MVP is an exercise in restraint. When there’s a vision for what an app could be, it’s tempting to build it out right from the start. Instead, start with a minimal version, then add features based on user feedback and business priorities. Restricting the MVP to only the essential features stewards limited funds wisely and reduces risk.
Pro tip: Work closely with developers to identify features critical for launch and save “nice-to-haves” for future iterations.
Learn More: The MVP Advantage: Launching Your Product with Confidence
While there’s no set rule for what qualifies as basic vs. complex MVP features, the latter tends to require specialized development expertise.
An MVP might be considered complex if it includes these features or qualities:
Often, a feature might not sound very involved, but because of the development time and talent needed, it adds significant complexity. Consulting a development expert is key to reducing the risk of surprise expenses and planning an MVP budget.
Explore Designli’s mobile app development services →
An MVP represents the first functional version of an app. Still, design is no less important for an MVP than for a more established app. An MVP’s user interface (UI) and user experience (UX) design inform the way users respond to it. No matter how complex the features of an MVP, having a user-friendly interface strengthens user adoption and retention.
A budget-friendly MVP doesn't have to mean skimping on UX/UI design. For apps requiring unique design features, however, you should expect to pay more. Consider these ways that MVP design choices can impact your budget.
As with other cost-related MVP decisions, it’s helpful to consider the goal of the product and which essential features will provide value to users. Future iterations can always include additional design features.
Designing an MVP requires balance. Aim for an application that balances both usability and cost. Your MVP probably won’t win any design awards, and that’s okay. Focus on delivering a clean, intuitive design rather than a highly customized look. Before pursuing a responsive or cross-platform development approach, consider which platforms or devices are the highest priority. In many cases, leveraging cross-platform frameworks can be an asset to your app’s success, However, in others, choosing just one platform is sufficient.
Learn More: Cross-Platform App Development for Startups: Is It the Right Fit for Your App?
Yes, MVP design choices can affect cost. Aiming for a simple, yet functional UI and choosing launch platforms carefully is the best way to minimize design-related expenses. While custom UI and animations might be essential for some MVPs, most can afford to incorporate design enhancements in future iterations when user feedback validates the need for such upgrades.
A technology stack—that is, the programming languages, frameworks, and tools used in development—has important implications, both on cost and the future of your business. The right tech stack balances both affordability and scalability. Be sure to do thorough research on all your options.
Learn More: The Ultimate Guide to Choosing the Best Tech Stack for Your Product
When building an MVP tech stack, you’ll encounter several choices. Each type of tech stack offers benefits, but some are more costly than others.
Some tech stacks boast cult-like popularity, but that should not be enough to make your choice. Be sure to weigh the short- and long-term costs of choosing one stack or another. For example, the MEAN tech stack—MongoDB, Express.js, Angular, and Node.js—leverages fully open-sourced technologies, making it a cost-efficient stack. By contrast, the WISA tech stack—Windows Server, Internet Information Services (IIS), SQL Server, and ASP.NET—can become quite expensive over time.
When it comes to your tech stack, it’s important to take a holistic view of cost. What’s cheapest today might not be the most cost-efficient long-term. This is particularly true if your tech stack limits future growth. Look for a set of solutions that accommodates today’s budget and technical requirements while still leaving the door open for growth down the road. If you anticipate the need to scale up your operations in the future, choose a tech stack that prioritizes scalability and flexibility.
A cost-effective MVP tech stack typically includes a mix of open-source, cross-platform, and cloud technologies.
Learn More: Navigating the Cross-Platform App Development Landscape: A Comprehensive Guide to Frameworks
The team you choose for MVP development directly impacts costs. The best model balances business needs with budget. Whether you choose an in-house, outsourced, or hybrid model, understand the tradeoffs of each first.
Even a focused development effort like an MVP requires several key roles.
Each team member brings a specific expertise and serves an important function in the development process.
Hiring individual freelancers can be the cheapest option; however, this staffing model requires significant oversight. An agency offers a happy medium between freelancers and an in-house team. The right development partner offers a clear and reliable process plus a solid team of experts at a fraction of the price of an in-house team. Building up an internal team offers the highest degree of control, but it comes at a cost. An in-house approach tends to be the most expensive development team structure.
As with your app itself, a lean approach will save you from unnecessary spending. Try starting with a small team that only has the essential roles. A small but high-quality team will often get you further than a large team of questionable talent. Remember, you can always hire additional team members and development specialists later.
In the absence of an existing in-house development team, outsourcing is typically the best approach to manage MVP price. A partnership with a development agency allows you to “turn on” the development team whenever needed, without having to worry about employee costs like training, office space, salaries, or benefits. In addition to upfront cost, also consider your business goals, timelines, scalability needs, and preferences for control when choosing between in-house or outsourced teams.
Learn More: Outsource vs. In-House Software Development: Making the Right Choice for Your Business
Testing and iteration are a vital part of MVP development. Releasing a well-tested, functional product increases your chances of achieving early adopter satisfaction and gaining traction. On the other hand, failing to prioritize iteration and testing steps can result in bugs, security incidents, or service interruptions, all of which jeopardize business success.
Testing for MVPs includes two critical rounds, alpha and beta testing, each of which informs early product iterations.
Initial testing usually isn’t a significant expense, compared to testing later on in the iterative process. Often, it’s not the testing itself, however, that contributes to development cost as much as the iterations that stem from feedback. If an MVP requires frequent adjustments, expect more development expenses. Relatively small updates, like simple feature additions or color changes, likely won’t pose a huge financial burden, but iterations that add complexity can get costly quickly.
To avoid surprises, it’s a good idea to allocate a portion of your MVP development budget for bug fixes, minor updates, and scalability improvements. This ensures you’ll be able to address user feedback promptly and with adequate iterations. Especially in the beginning, user satisfaction is critical for gaining momentum.
The cost of testing and iteration varies based on various factors, including the kind of testing, the complexity of the app, and the type of iterations. Hiring a team to conduct user testing, for example, will be more costly than straightforward alpha testing, which focuses on glaring issues. Likewise, iterations that require advanced development techniques, like unstructured workflows or connecting to APIs, will cost more than simple cosmetic changes. You don’t necessarily need to spend a lot of money to embrace the agile development methodology. Working with an experienced development partner can help you solicit and respond to feedback while managing limited funds.
Without proper planning, hidden costs can quickly derail an MVP budget. Hidden costs are fees and expenses that aren’t apparent in the development process but are still vital for success. App store fees, such as those Apple and Google charge for launching iOS and Android apps, are one common example of a hidden cost. Other examples include legal fees or promotional expenses. Anticipating hidden costs is crucial since they can quickly add up and become a significant expense.
There are many categories of hidden costs, but not every type applies to every app. Knowing what to look for can help determine which hidden costs could affect your MVP development process.
It’s a good idea to reserve a portion of your MVP development budget specifically for hidden costs. Consider which types of hidden costs apply to your MVP so that you can include an appropriate budget buffer to use if needed. Some experts recommend earmarking about 20 percent of your development budget for hidden and unforeseen expenses.
The best way to budget for hidden costs is to understand common types of hidden costs and anticipate them before your project kicks off. Most hidden costs are directly tied to your MVP’s technology stack and intended platforms, which tend to be transparent about their cost structure. For example, many pay-as-you-go cloud platforms publish price calculators to help developers estimate licensing fees based on expected usage. Researching these costs ahead of time can help you build a comfortable budget with enough margin.
A clear and accurate projected MVP cost can help you stay on budget and reduce the risk of insufficient funding. To estimate cost, hone in on the key factors influencing MVP price: complexity, design requirements, technology stack, team structure, as well as iteration and testing. In each category, there are ways you can manage cost and budget effectively. Most importantly, prioritize only the most essential features, choose a cost-effective technology stack, and reserve funds for iteration. The time and effort it takes to nail down a clear MVP cost range pay off. A well-planned MVP offers a foundation for future growth by serving as a tool to collect worthwhile insights.
Looking for a partner to help you achieve extraordinary value from your limited MVP budget? Designli specializes in supporting businesses through the MVP development process. From assembling the right team to choosing the right frameworks and more, we help our clients navigate all the MVP decisions and take the next step toward their business goals. Schedule a free consultation to discover more.
Explore Designli's UX/UI Design Services →
You might also like:
Subscribe to our newsletter.
Launching a successful product is challenging, but it doesn't have to be a gamble. There is a way to test the waters, validate your idea, and gather...
It’s no secret that many successful app startups launch as a minimum viable product (MVP). By focusing on the core features, you can minimize risks,...
Are you hoping to turn an idea into a billion-dollar app? You’ll need an MVP. In the startup world, a minimum viable product (MVP) is an invaluable...
Post
Share